Sports

Tennis’ Starring Role for Influencers at the US Open Sparks Debate

A surge of influencers at the US Open raises questions about etiquette and focus at tennis' premier event, blending content creation with sportsmanship.

Sep 06, 2026 ● 3 min read
Sign in to save

NEW YORK, USA – The US Open this year has transformed into a hotspot for influencers and content creators, equipped with their smartphones and lighting, seemingly overshadowing the on-court thrills at this prestigious tennis event. This phenomenon isn't just a passing trend; it reflects a significant shift in how major sporting events are marketed and consumed today.

Organizers revealed that around 100 influencers received credentials, with 20 specifically tasked with covering the culinary delights available, including items like caviar-topped chicken nuggets and the iconic “Honey Deuce” cocktail, designed to attract viral engagement. The emphasis on food and drink isn't surprising, as enhancing the viewer experience off the court has become a priority, but it raises questions about the balance between traditional sports coverage and modern digital marketing techniques.

@elirallo #usopen #honeyd ♬ original sound – Eli Rallo

Meanwhile, numerous social media enthusiasts have mingled in the stands and plaza, having sourced their tickets independently. Their presence is a testament to the event's ability to draw in a broader audience, contributing to the social media frenzy that characterizes today’s sports culture. This infusion of new attendees generates buzz online, but it also inevitably shifts the focus from athletic performance to influencer interactions.

Former finalist Madison Keys reflected on the tournament's identity, stating, “Every Slam has its own vibe, and the US Open has always felt like the ‘big-show Grand Slam.’” With its flamboyant atmosphere, the US Open has long served as a significant cultural moment, but the influx of influencers adds a layer of spectacle that could redefine its essence.

Etiquette Under Fire

The presence of celebrities is well-established at the US Open, from Hollywood A-listers to political figures; the affluent are accustomed to paying top dollar for prime seats at this quintessential New York sporting occasion. Yet celebrities, with their respect for the sport, don’t typically disrupt the game the way some influencers do. This raises the question: Should familiar norms of decorum be adjusted for a new class of attendees?

However, the increasing involvement of influencers is stirring controversy. Recently, a chair umpire had to reprimand a group for conducting a disruptive photo shoot while Naomi Osaka was in the middle of serving during her first-round match against Anastasia Zakharova. Such incidents highlight a clear clash between traditional sporting etiquette and the modern quest for social media engagement, an issue that needs addressing.

After winning her second-round match, Osaka commented, “If you're at a sporting event, you need to respect the sport. It’s great if influencers can attract new fans, but it has to be managed better, especially during matches.” This sentiment reflects a growing concern among players who feel that the game should come first, not Instagram opportunities. The balance between generating buzz and maintaining respect for the sport raises critical questions about the future interplay of athletics and social media.

Similarly, another influencer drew backlash for taking selfies amidst play, interrupting the game while Keys competed against Alina Korneeva—an act many felt blatantly disrespected tennis etiquette. When influencers prioritize their content over the spectator experience, they risk alienating one of the sport's core audiences. It’s a precarious situation.

Jessica Pegula, who was the runner-up in 2024, acknowledged the influencers' impact but showed concern regarding the disruption, saying, “I enjoy the showcase they bring, but using selfie lights while players are performing feels a bit disrespectful.” Her opinion encapsulates the duality of influencers at events like these—while they might enhance visibility, there’s a fine line that, when crossed, detracts from the sport itself.

Broader Implications

This trend mirrors the US Open's escalating popularity, prompting organizers to lengthen the tournament to 15 days and introduce mixed doubles as a prelude to the main events. By capitalizing on this new demographic, the tournament is trying to enhance its relevance, but at what cost? The challenge will be to find a middle ground that retains the essence of tennis while accommodating a more diverse audience.

Earlier this year, the men’s ATP tour expanded its partnership with TikTok, citing a 25% surge in posts tagged with #tennis, reflecting a growing interest in the sport. This increased visibility is beneficial, but it underscores how social media platforms are changing not only how fans engage with sports but how athletes and events are marketed as well.

Daniil Medvedev, the 2021 champion, remarked, “The more exposure tennis gets, the better for the sport. However, disruptions during play due to influencer activities can complicate matters.” As more athletes express reservations about influencer conduct, the US Open must consider reforms to ensure the integrity of the sport is preserved while still harnessing the influencer culture.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Influencers at Sporting Events

The rising pressure from influencers suggests that traditional sporting events may need to rethink their strategies. This isn't merely about introducing new audience members; it's about understanding how their presence alters the atmosphere and diminishes the focus on athletic performance. If you're working in this space, consider this: redefining what it means to be a fair-weather fan in today’s connected culture may become as complex as the sport itself.

As organizers strive for a balance between modern marketing methods and the inherent values of athletics, this dynamic is only going to intensify. The implication here is significant. Will influencers continue to be seen as assets, or will they eventually be viewed as a distraction? The answer may depend on how both parties navigate these shifting priorities in the coming years.

Source: Reuters · www.rappler.com

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.